A Diminishing Republic Ruled by way of Obama, or via Law?

If you were an American law enforcement officer, say a town police officer, sworn to uphold the U.S. Constitution and your State Constitution and to put into effect your State’s penal code, and you knew of a conspiracy being hatched to rob a financial institution for your metropolis, would you prepare to arrest the perpetrators before they robbed the financial institution and brought extreme harm to harmless human beings? Moreover, in case you knew that the perpetrators had been recognized criminals with long rap-sheets full of crimes and misdemeanors, would you attempt to act promptly to keep the crime from happening? Yet, what in case your watch commander and, even, your police chief, instructed you to stand-down when you stated to them the incontrovertible records approximately the upcoming crime, when it was going to arise, how it’d occur, and the precise day and time? What in the event that they, however, instructed you that it did not remember and to forget about approximately it?

To solution those poignant questions, I will especially point to an editorial that appeared on the front-page of the August 2, 2014, version of the “Washington Post” entitled, “Obama readies government action on immigration.” This article, coming from about the maximum Marxist propagandizing newspaper in u. S ., frivolously posted this excuse for journalism with the identical contempt for the U.S. Constitution as they did when they announced that the superb (illegal) bill, Obamacare, was at the President’s desk for signature. The article need to have, as a substitute, be nicely entitled, “Obama plans excessive-crime to trouble the unlawful and unconstitutional executive order granting amnesty to similarly denigrate the U.S. Constitution. Why is this so?

Well, the most compelling cause is that executive orders aren’t referred to inside the U.S. Constitution. They are an abstruse creation of the U.S. Supreme Court. Article 2 does not, in any manner, supply the President authority to preserve the legislative, government, and judicial powers in one hand, and a bull-whip within the different. The President, as chief government, has best the specific electricity to trouble directives, no longer laws, that affect most effective the working fame of the personnel of the executive branch. He has no electricity to unilaterally create a regulation (tantamount to a U.S. Statute or code), to define and interpret its criminal fame, and to put into effect it. That is the perfect definition of natural tyranny.

Remember the infamous govt order issued through the first real American Fuhrer, Franklin D. Roosevelt, whilst he ordered, in overdue 1941, that every one of the innocent Japanese-Americans be rounded-up and imprisoned in internment camps? That order changed into later ruled as unconstitutional via the U.S. Supreme Court, because it should had been before it turned into issued. That order turned into accountable for over a hundred deaths in those internment camps, and ruined quite a few human lives. Something very awful after 1929, came about to the majority of the American people once they have been exposed to the severe adversity of a Depression intentionally engineered by way of the Federal Reserve, in 1927, when it secretly ordered that 1/three of the paper and coin cash in move be taken out of flow incrementally (Economist Milton Friedman set up this truth). By 1929, the runs on the banks and savings and loans inside the state had been imminent. Then, when it took place, the People of the USA buckled to socialism, authorities regulation, and the philosophies of John Maynard Keynes, which were applied with the aid of FDR in his unconstitutional New Deal. The People surrendered their valuable liberty and freedom to the federal authorities for some brief physical safety, thinking that FDR became a savior in preference to the demon he become. There were at that point a few American constitutional patriots who fought Roosevelt, however thru FDR’s deceitful conspiracy and collusion, confirmed thru specific ancient studies, they misplaced the combat.

The first govt order became, exceptionally, rendered by means of right antique President George Washington when he took it upon himself to do the activity of Congress by using ordering the building of the first federal mint. Congress ought to have tongue-lashed Washington and advised him in no way to assume a legislative electricity that rightfully belongs to the Congress. Nonetheless, Washington changed into now not reprimanded (he become, for a few purpose, extolled) for his usurpation of the U.S. Constitution, and a precedent became unconstitutionally set that a President has the electricity to trouble “government orders.” Yet, the antique, however authentic, aphorism, “deliver them an inch, and they’ll take a mile” turned into exemplified with the aid of that going on, and has been ever more genuine in the passage of records due to the fact that that first unlawful order become given.

ct-transcript-of-president-barack-obama-farewell-speech-20170110 (2048×1152)

Now, getting again to unlawful immigration, there are legal guidelines, U.S. Codes, which have been surpassed by plural (Democratic and Republican) Congresses, and signed by standing U.S. Presidents, going again to Harry Truman, which make illegal immigration into the USA, throughout U.S. Borders, a criminal offense, and actionable with the aid of federal law enforcement. According to status law, any federal law enforcement officer can interfere in the commission of a federal crime, together with bank robbery, kidnapping, shoplifting, and unlawful immigration. If they intentionally do not interfere at some point of robberies or kidnappings, they can not use, as an excuse for no longer intervening, that it was no longer his, or her, jurisdiction. This applies to all federal regulation enforcement officials, the FBI, the U.S. Marshall’s Service, the DEA, the ATF, and many others. For example, if an armed, or unarmed, U.S. Border Patrol officer or INS (ICE) agent witnesses a bank theft, a kidnapping, an act of shoplifting in DC, or an act of illegal immigration, he, or she, has the authority to interfere, to prevent the crime, and to arrest the perpetrators. If an FBI agent, maybe, witnesses a van-load of illegal extraterrestrial beings, from Tijuana, Mexico, unloading in Chula Vista, California, he has the jurisdiction to intervene and arrest the aliens and turn them over to the U.S. Border Patrol. This is most effective as reasonable as the obligation of a deputy sheriff to have the jurisdiction to put in force any, and all, state legal guidelines in any metropolis in that county wherein the neighborhood police aren’t witnesses to crimes that are devoted. The object of regulation enforcement, federal, country, and nearby, is to preserve the public peace and protection for the residents of the States who’re American residents, via the proper enforcement of all laws, federal, nation, and local, legislated and enacted for the general public appropriate. When those legal guidelines are intentionally no longer enforced, the peace and safety of the People, for which those laws had been supposed, diminishes in proportion to the diminution of regulation. I believe that that is what the Honorable John Adams intended while he solemnly said, “We are a nation of legal guidelines, and no longer of guys.”

 

READ ALSO  :